ยท 4 min read

Case study: the cloud bill from EUR 74 000 to EUR 43 000 a month.

One engagement, told in numbers. Logistics SaaS, about 30 engineers, everything on AWS. Details are shifted enough that the company cannot be recognised; the shape and the orders of magnitude are real.

The starting point

The AWS bill stood at EUR 74 000 a month and had grown about 4 percent a month for two years, while revenue grew half that fast. Finance had negotiated a savings plan twice; the curve did not move, because the problem was not the price of the machines. Nobody in the building could say what a third of the bill bought.

What the diagnosis found

Three weeks of reading the spend against the architecture and the traffic. The bill split into three kinds of money:

The numbers after 5 months

BeforeAfter 5 months
AWS bill, monthlyEUR 74 000EUR 43 000
TrendPlus 4 percent a monthFlat against traffic
LayoffsNone
Re-platformingNone. The stack stayed.
Owners named for the top 10 cost lines2 of 1010 of 10

What it took

The fixed-price diagnosis, then one day a week for four months alongside the existing team. The engineers did the work; what had been missing was not skill but a mandate, a sequence, and someone senior enough to decide what could be switched off. The saving of about EUR 370 000 a year cost a low five-figure engagement.

Why it worked

Every line of the bill got a named owner, and the debt got a monthly price the board could see. Once "the pipeline costs EUR 12 000 a month to not fix" was written down, fixing it stopped being a technical discussion and became an ordinary business decision. That is usually the whole trick: the bill is an ownership problem wearing a pricing costume.


Anonymised by design: sector, sizes and timings are shifted, the structure of what happened is not. References, including for this engagement, on the intro call.